Gap report — 2026-05-27

How this was produced

This gap report was generated from the site activity snapshot for the period 2026-05-20 to 2026-05-27. Analysis covers 57 new/updated documents, 6 active authors, and 131 raw events. The dominant workstreams this period are SQLite/daemon performance investigation (sql-busy), identity UX design iterations, and document command design solutions. No comment activity was detected on any document.

Open gaps

🔴 High priority

  • SQLite contention resolution plan lacks a consolidated decision record

  • Evidence: sql-busy, actions, global-picture, linear-performance-techniques-plan-web--electron

  • Why it matters: The sql-busy thread has generated 20+ documents exploring WAL mode, backoffs, daemon pooling, and Erlang principles, but no single document captures which approaches were adopted, rejected, or deferred.

  • Proposed action: Create a synthesis document that consolidates the decisions from the actions document and the global-picture analysis into a single decision record.

  • Suggested owner:

🟡 Medium priority

  • Document commands design solutions lack a rationale for chosen approach

  • Evidence: document-commands/-design-solutions, versions-history

  • Why it matters: The design solutions document exists but the rationale for why specific command patterns were chosen over alternatives is not captured.

  • Proposed action: Add a "Decision rationale" section to the design solutions document that explains trade-offs considered.

  • Suggested owner:

🟢 Low priority / parking lot

  • "Add search to a query block" issue lacks linked design exploration

  • Evidence: add-search-to-a-query-block

  • Why it matters: This issue was updated but no design document or tech talk explores the implementation approach.

  • Proposed action: Link any existing design exploration or create a lightweight proposal document.

  • Suggested owner: open

  • "Adding cover and icon to the document" issue lacks UX rationale

  • Evidence: adding-cover-and-icon-to-the-document

  • Why it matters: The issue exists but there is no documented rationale for why covers and icons are needed or how they fit into the document model.

  • Proposed action: Add a brief design rationale comment or link to the relevant HIL design principles.

  • Suggested owner: open

Contradictions detected

No contradictions detected this period. The sql-busy thread shows exploratory divergence (multiple approaches being investigated in parallel) but no explicit contradictions between documents.

Stale or potentially outdated content

  • Tech sync meeting notes from 2026-05-2120206-05-21--tech-sync was updated on 2026-05-26 but the filename contains a typo ("20206" instead of "2026"). This may cause confusion in chronological sorting.

  • sql-busy parent documentsql-busy was last updated 2026-05-22 but many child documents were updated through 2026-05-27. The parent may not reflect the latest state of the investigation.

Patterns

  • Deep investigative thread pattern: The sql-busy thread shows a pattern of one author () creating many narrow, single-topic documents (WAL, backoffs, contention, daemon pool, vacuum, rollback) and then synthesizing them into a global-picture document. This is a healthy knowledge production pattern.

  • Identity UX iteration pattern: Two authors ( and <hm://z6

Do you like what you are reading? Subscribe to receive updates.

Unsubscribe anytime